What the studies show
No human data by injection at all. In cells and mice LL-37 is a driver of inflammation in psoriasis and lupus, which argues against, not for, the marketed use.
Animal studies, cell studies, or anecdotes only. This is where almost every viral peptide sits. Promising and proven are different words for a reason.
- 1Reviews of LL-37 biology in infection, wound repair and autoimmunity.VariousPreclinical mechanism; no systemic human data.
In context
LL-37 is the only cathelicidin peptide humans make — a 37-amino-acid antimicrobial produced by skin, gut and immune cells that kills bacteria and signals inflammation and repair. The human evidence is two randomised trials of a topical gel on venous leg ulcers: a 34-patient phase 2a that found faster healing, and a 148-patient phase 2b that did not, except in a subgroup of large wounds. Nothing supports the injected 'immune' or 'anti-inflammatory' uses sold online, and injected LL-37 is pro-inflammatory in the laboratory.
LL-37 is not approved. Legal status differs by country — see the regulation section or the jurisdiction pages.
Questions
Is LL-37 proven to help with systemic 'immune support' or anti-inflammatory use?
What studies are behind the grade?
Is LL-37 approved for this?
Other outcomes for LL-37
- CVenous leg ulcer healing (topical)2 RCTs (n=34, n=148)
- DAntimicrobial action in people0 controlled
- CSafety (topical)adverse2 RCTs
Reviewed 3 September 2026. Grades count human evidence only; see how LYO grades. Not medical advice. Correct this page →